Skip to content
 

The drying of the River Euphrates – a sign of the end of times?

Last night I was watching a Fox News report of the recent drying of the River Euphrates which extends into Iraq and Iran. I thought to myself: well that sounds familiar … where have I heard that before?

One Google search later, I was confronted with a Bible verse from the book of Revelation, 16:12.

The sixth angel poured out his bowl on the great river Euphrates, and its water was dried up to prepare the way for the kings from the East.

Interestingly, I also stumbled upon a New York Times article which stated:

The shrinking of the Euphrates, a river so crucial to the birth of civilization that the Book of Revelation prophesied its drying up as a sign of the end times, has decimated farms along its banks, has left fishermen impoverished and has depleted riverside towns as farmers flee to the cities looking for work.

The Times actually got something right. The drying of the Euphrates is a direct and physical fulfillment of biblical prophecy. The context of that chapter — and the entire book for that matter — is a foretelling of the end of times. The book of Revelation is a description of visions by the apostle John, revealed to him by Jesus Christ.

Many Christians, like myself, tend to neglect the book of Revelation because of the complex imagery and metaphors that the apostle John uses to describe his vision. Some define the book as a literal interpretation of the end of times, others a metaphorical; but whatever the case may be, it is clear that we do not have a God’s-eye perspective of this world and must therefore make do with the rational devices we are given.

And so, using our ‘rational devices’, let us examine some of the other prophecies found in God’s word that concern the end of times. There are a heck of a lot I might add. In fact, too many that have been fulfilled for me to elaborate on. But, for the sake of time, I will focus on a select few.

In Matthew 24:3 Jesus was asked by his disciples, “Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of your coming, and of the end of the age?” Keep in mind that Mathew, Mark, Luke and John are all accounts of the same thing — the life of Jesus Christ who is God in the flesh. The book of Revelation, as I clarified, is John’s vision of the ends of times and the various other books which I will be quoting from are portions of God’s divine revelation through other men.

In Matthew 24:11 Jesus states that “Many false prophets will arise, and will mislead many.”

False Prophets? The worlds chalk full of em’. And we need not look too deeply into the life of a certain middle-eastern man named Muhammad who, some 500 years after Christ’s death, founded an entire works-based religion, deceiving billions and promoting death and violence as a means to bring about the coming of the messiah. Some people call it Jihad. This is the prescriptive message of Islam which is the antithesis of Christ’s message.

Christianity establishes salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ alone. Islam establishes salvation by works alone as defined by the prophet Muhammad. While the religion of Islam spreads through destruction and violence, the redemptive message of Christ spreads through faith and love. Not John Lennon hippie love. Not Buddah love. God love. Love in it’s highest form (John 15:1) which provides for us an escape, not only from the terror and wickedness of this world, but from the consequences of our own sin (Romans 6:23).

Moving on to another end of times prophecy:

Revelation 13:1-2 “And I saw (John speaking) a beast coming out of the sea. He had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on his horns, and on each head a blasphemous name. The beast I saw resembled a leopard, but had feet like those of a bear and a mouth like that of a lion. The dragon gave the beast his power and his throne and great authority.”

The book of Revelation is persistent on the appearance of two beings known as the Dragon and the Beast during the end of times.

If you happened to have turned on the news once this year, you’ll know who Ahmadinejad is. As the president of the Islamic state of Iran, he is the current champion of the radical Islamic world and believes that Islam will enforce a bloody reign upon ‘all the mountain tops of the world’. He is responsible for the deaths of thousands (if not millions) in the name of ‘Allah’, the god of Islam. He is a man who, under the Shiite doctrine of taqiyya, is permitted to lie outwardly to achieve the goals of Islam. That includes lying at UN speeches. He is also a man that proclaims ‘Death to Israel!’ at the end of each of his speeches to his Iranian countryman. And a man who will soon have (in a matter of months) nuclear weapons. The following is a portion of an interview between NBC’s Ann Curry and Ahmadinejad. Despite being in the official transcript, this portion of the interview was not televised.

NBC’s Ann Curry: In your speeches, you pray for God to hasten the arrival of the hidden Imam, the Muslim messiah. Would you tell us, as I know you will speak about this at the general assembly, as well. What is your relationship with the hidden Imam, and how soon do you think before the second coming?

President Ahmadinejad: Yes, that’s true. I prayed for the arrival of the 12th Imam. The owner of the age, as we call him. Because the owner of the age is the symbol of the – justice and brotherly love prevailing around the world. When the Imam arrives, all of these problems will be resolved. And a prayer for the owner of the age is nothing but a wish for justice and brotherly love to prevail around the world. And it’s an obligation a person takes upon himself to always think about brotherly love. And also to treating others as equals. All people can establish such a connection with the Imam of the age. It’s roughly the same as the relationship which exists between Christians and the Christ. They speak with Jesus Christ and they are sure that Christ hears them. And responds. Therefore, this is not limited to us only. Any person can talk with the Imam.

The Antichrist — described not only in the imagery of Revelation, but also in the prophecies of Daniel and other old testament books — is characterized as a world uniter and global peace keeper. I like the explanation at prca.org:

A little word study may help to understand the prefix “anti” in the name Antichrist. Just as antivenom is given to counteract the venom of a snake bite, and antiseptic is used against infection, so Antichrist is against, is opposed to, Jesus Christ. This tells us the essence of what Antichrist is: he is opposition to God’s Christ. He is opposition to Christ personally; he is against Christ’s Church; he is against Christ’s Word, Holy Scripture. Furthermore, because Christ’s mission is to show the name of Jehovah God to men by showing Himself to them (see John 17:6John 14:8,9, and Revelation 13:6), Antichrist is opposed to God Himself.

So, although the Antichrist will leave the impression that his motivating force is love, concern for humanity, and pity for the oppressed, what drives Antichrist is not love but hatred. The one motivating force in his life is opposition to Jesus Christ, opposition to all that He stands for, and to all that stand for Him.

So with that in mind, let’s look at some more of Ahmadinejad’s word’s during the NBC interview with Ann Curry:

Ahmadinejad: What is being said about an apocalyptic war and – global war, things of that nature. This is what the Zionists are claiming. Imam…will come with logic, with culture, with science. He will come so that there is no more war. No more enmity, hatred. No more conflict. He will call on everyone to enter a brotherly love. Of course, he will return with Jesus Christ. The two will come back together. And working together, they would fill this world with love. The stories that have been disseminated around the world about extensive war, apocalyptic wars, so on and so forth, these are false.

Could it be that this ‘Imam’ and the christ (or rather who Ahmadinejad believes is christ) who returns are the Dragon and Beast described in the Bible? The word Antichrist means just that — an entity opposite the charector of Christ in every virtue. But he or it (some people believe the Antichrist to be a political power such as a new world order) will not only stand opposite to Christ in virtue, but will also attempt to replace him. I like the explanation by Barry Gritters at nrca.org.

The name Antichrist also indicates substitution. Antichrist opposes Jesus in order to supplant Him, to take His place as Christ. Although the English language does not often use the prefix “anti” to mean substitution, it is a common use of the preposition in the Greek language. When Scripture says that Jesus died “for His people,” one of the prepositions used is anti indicating that He died as a substitute for His people. This is the secondary meaning of the preposition anti. Antichrist purposes to be “in the place of,” or “a substitute for” Jesus the Christ.

II Thessalonians 2 points out how Antichrist comes as an impostor of the Christ from God, and how there is a striking outward similarity between Antichrist and Christ. Will Jesus Christ be revealed some day? So will Antichrist (Vss 3,8). Will Christ be in God’s temple? Antichrist will sit there also (Vs 4). Is Christ God? Antichrist will claim to be (Vs 4). Did Christ support His claim to be God with signs and wonders? Antichrist, too, will perform signs and wonders (Vs 9). Christ has a kingdom; so will Antichrist. Christ comes by the power of the Spirit; Antichrist will come by the power of a spirit, who is the devil himself.

Does it surprise anyone, then, that in the Middle Ages Antichrist was called the “ape of Christ”? He comes in the place of Christ, making himself out to be Christ. In every way mimicking Christ, Antichrist will propose to be Christ. Antichrist is Satan’s counterpart to Christ. Jesus was God’s choice to establish His kingdom, redeem His people, renew creation; Antichrist is Satan’s choice to establish his kingdom, gather in as many people as he can, and subject all to himself. All of God’s plan hinges on the works of Jesus, the Christ; all of Satan’s plans hinge on the working and success of Antichrist.

These things have everything to do with my belief that the religion of Islam, and the doctrine that sustains it (the Qur’an and the Hadith) are in fact doctrines of demons. The evidence to support this, I believe, is insurmountable. I have laid out all of this evidence (or at least a portion of what exists) right here.

1 Timothy 4:1 “Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons.”

*Sigh* Good Lord, I have only scantily covered 3 prophecies and three hours have passed. I often fail to realize how deep and intricate the evidence is that exists in support of even just a few historical presuppositions found in the Bible.

Next verse.

Matthew 24:6 “And you will be hearing of wars and rumors of wars; see that you are not frightened, for those things must take place, but that is not yet the end.”

Wars and rumors of wars? This of course can be used to describe virtually any time period. Men make war. But let’s look in the next verse.

Matthew 24:7 “For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and in various places there will be famines and earthquakes.”

“Nation rising up against nation” does not sound to me like some guys throwing spears around in North Africa. Christ was certainly talking about a global war, involving many nations. This has happened at least twice in history (WWI and WWII), but is a third world war possible?

With a tyrannical holocaust-denying mass-murderer, who will soon have access to nuclear weapons — anything is possible. And I don’t think I can stress that enough. I don’t think people fully realize what a war with Iran would entail. With a conscriptable army of over 20 million, the Iranian military is no push-over. Even with the best case scenario — a full frontal war on Iraq before any nuclear missiles are launched — the confrontation would be many times more devastating than anything we saw in Iraq and Afghanistan. And, as has been made apparent in recent headlines, our president cares more about his own political agenda than the welfare of any country.

In respect to the second part of the above verse (“and in various places there will be famines and earthquakes”) I think with a global economic meltdown, a Tsunami (caused by an earthquake) today that ravaged Samoa and barely evaded the island state of Hawaii in addition to the Tsunami that took place off the coast of India in 04′ which claimed the lives of over 100,000, one could certainly make an argument there. O yes, and the world has seen no great shortage in the appearance of general non-Tsunami earthquakes. But I still think this is a prophecy that may not have been fulfilled yet or is still in the process of fulfillment.

Next prophetic verse.

II Timothy 3:1-5,7 “But realize this, that in the last days difficult times will come.  For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, malicious gossips, without self-control, brutal, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of god; holding to a form of godliness, although they have denied its power; always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.”

If you would like to find evidence for the deterioration of morals in our society, refer to you television, or ask Roman Polaski and nearly the entire Hollywood conglomerate — who would have us believe that skipping bail 30 years ago after being arrested for drugging and then raping a 13 year old girl is all just water under the bridge. My favorite is the NYT ‘news’ article which, lined with quotes from friends and co-workers who speak glowingly of Polaski’s character, rushes to Polaski’s defense. Of course the article neglects to mention what it was Polaski actually committed until the last paragraph! You gotta give the Times credit though, they make good use of the inverted pyramid. But even more delightful is the subsequent op-ed column which neglects to even mention the rape charges and concludes in this way:

But Ms. Geimer wants it dropped, to shield her family from distress, and Mr. Polanski’s own young children, to whom he is a doting father, want him home. He is no threat to the public. The original judicial procedure was undeniably murky. So cui bono, as the Romans used to say — who benefits?

Since when did justice become about ‘who benefits’? Sickening.

Aside from my incessant current issues side-ranting, the above is a quick glance at a few end of times prophecies that were fulfilled, or are in the process of being fulfilled. I cannot hope to lay out even a fifth of the EOT prophecies in the time I can afford tonight. Perhaps I will come back and add to this list a few more observations when I have time.

I heavily suggest reading a study conducted by a group of secular research scientists which, after examining old testament prophecies which came true, concludes that Bible is vastly more reliable than the second law of thermodynamics. Summary:

Since these thirteen prophecies cover mostly separate and independent events, the probability of chance occurrence for all thirteen is about 1 in 10138 (138 equals the sum of all the exponents of 10 in the probability estimates above). For the sake of putting the figure into perspective, this probability can be compared to the statistical chance that the second law of thermodynamics will be reversed in a given situation (for example, that a gasoline engine will refrigerate itself during its combustion cycle or that heat will flow from a cold body to a hot body)—that chance = 1 in 1080. Stating it simply, based on these thirteen prophecies alone, the Bible record may be said to be vastly more reliable than the second law of thermodynamics. Each reader should feel free to make his own reasonable estimates of probability for the chance fulfillment of the prophecies cited here. In any case, the probabilities deduced still will be absurdly remote.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

7 Comments

  1. [...] here to see the original: The drying of the River Euphrates – a sign of the end of times? By admin | category: outward | tags: bible, book, from-the-book, from-the-east, [...]

  2. Jonny says:

    I agree with many points that you have made in this post… I just have to disagree with you when you continually align Islam with violence. Not all Islamic people are violent, just like not all Christians are nonviolent. The crusades and other tragic events in history were carried out in the name of God and Christianity. I am by no means attacking you for having an opinion, but the TRUTH is what matters and some of the things you wrote are just totally untrue. You wrote: “He is responsible for the deaths of thousands (if not millions) in the name of ‘Allah’, the god of Islam.” This is just a bold faced lie. What was Hitlers religion? Who helped fund the Nazi regime that litterally killed millions? My friend please do some homework before you write things that make yourself look foolish. There is proof that there have been more people killed, tortured, and made to be outcasts by the Christian / Catholic church than any other religion on this planet. And many interpret the first beast in Daniels prophecy to be the Roman Catholic Church! I am a Christian man myself, and I refuse to accept this garbage that you are spreading about how violent the people of Muslim faith are! Humble yourself my friend and see that God created man in his own image. For us to see the perfect image of God you need ALL people represented.
    Is it Christ-like to label the people of Muslim faith as murderous savages?… or should you be trying to understand ALL people and tell ALL people the TRUTH? One last comment before I finish… please don’t attack me for giving my opinion because the views above were your opinion, it was your own interpretation of the scripture and prophecy.

  3. admin says:

    Hi Jonny.

    I have often heard the argument that Islam is a relatively peaceful religion, and that those responsible for terrorist attacks and government corruption in the Middle-East are just ‘fringe movements’. However, I think this is a false understanding — let me tell you why.

    Keep in mind, we are talking about the religion itself and not its people. Yes, I’ll grant you that the majority of Muslims are peaceful, but where do the extremists and fringe groups like Al Quida, Hamas and Hezbollah take root? Where does this deranged obsession with the obliteration of the nation of Israel come from? History will tell us that the Jews, who have populated Jerusalem and surrounding areas for the better part of 3 millenniums, have more of a right to the slither of land which they possess than any other people group. And yet on the day it was declared Independent, the surrounding arab nations attempted invasion (another fulfillment of prophecy btw).

    You will find, if you open the Qur’an, that these ‘fringe movements’ are not disobeying the will of Allah. In fact, the radicals and extremists are the most faithful to Allah; they are fulfilling the tenets of Islam which is to eradicate the unbelievers from the face of the earth. We need only look at the deeds of the father of Islam, Muhammad, to obtain a proper understanding of it. When I said Muhammad is responsible for the deaths of millions, I was speaking literally. Ignoring his conquest of Arabia and much of the known world, you can contribute a vast majority of Middle-Eastern conflicts from Islamic religious motives. And you say ‘but the Christians had the Crusades!’ But the Crusades was very much a necessary conflict NOT motivated by Christian scripture. Christ said “those who live by the sword, die by the sword”. There is absolutely no merit in the argument that the Crusades was propelled by true Christian doctrine or the teachings of Christ. I say a “necessary conflict” because it did stop the spread of Muslim conquerers in the 11th century.

    I think you are in need of witnessing the Qur’an challenge:
    http://www.cmscott.com/steven-crowders-the-quran-challenge/
    Also, check out my “True Nature of Islam” post:
    http://www.cmscott.com/the-true-nature-of-islam/

    Most people who speak on behalf of the religion of Islam are not at all familiar with any of it’s fundamental teachings. The only way we can come to a verdict on the ‘peacefulness’ of such a religion is to study its doctrine and founder, the prophet Muhammad, and the fruit if its disciples. I am not willing to compromise that Islam is a peaceful religion — this stems from the biblically objective conclusion that Muhammad was in fact a false prophet. I believe that those peace loving Muslims that we see in the world are in fact backslidden, inconsistent Muslims.

    You mentioned Hitler’s religion as an example of people, other than Muslims, who also use religion for terrible things. I am not sure what exactly you intended to imply. Did you intend to imply that Hitler was a Christian? If so, I will tell you clearly that he was not. During his regime, eugenicists who committed some of the most vile crimes in Nazi Germany, did so under the worldview of secular Darwinian Evolution. Hitler himself was an occultist who, inspired much by a popular novel he read while growing up in early 21st century anti-semitic Vienna, believed in a superior Aryan race which would dominate civilization. His life in Austria and early chancellorhood was influenced regularly by meetings with occulists, and at some point he even carried around with him a mandrake root. All of this is well documented. There isn’t a morsel of historical evidence that concludes Hitler was in any way inwardly or outwardly Christian.

  4. Jonny says:

    Thanks for the open forum. Once again, I agree with many of the points that were made in the post and I truly admire your blog. I wasn’t defending the Islamic religion, or trying to speak on behalf of the religion at all. I was just simply pointing out the error about Ahmadinejad where you stated that “He is responsible for the deaths of thousands (if not millions) in the name of ‘Allah’, the god of Islam.” How is that? I never said that the Crusades were based on the teachings of Christ. I also wasn’t trying imply anything in regard to Hitler’s religion. I was pointing out the FACT that he was responsible for the genocide of millions of Jews. However, if you would like to discuss his religion or his childhood in Viena, check out these excerpts:

    Hitler may have been influenced by the writings of the ideologist and anti-Semite Lanz von Liebenfels and polemics from politicians such as Karl Lueger, founder of the CHRISTIAN SOCIAL PARTY and Mayor of Vienna.

    Hitler may also have been influenced by Martin Luther’s “On the Jews and their Lies”.

    In Mein Kampf, Hitler refers to Martin Luther as a great warrior, a true statesman, and a great reformer, alongside Wagner and Frederick the Great.

    Wilhelm Röpke, writing after the Holocaust, concluded that “without any question, Lutheranism influenced the political, spiritual and social history of Germany in a way that, after careful consideration of everything, can be described only as fateful.”

    I am not trying to be argumentative, but you also brought up ‘fringe movements’ like Al Quida, Hamas and Hezbollah. Why do they call it RADICAL Islam my friend? These groups are extreme! There are terrorist groups and militias around the world and right here in America who are steeped in Christian belief and symbolism… have you ever heard of the KKK?

    Basically all I was saying is that as Christians ourselves we shouldn’t peddle fear or false statements to the masses. I may not have typed my original comment as eloquently as possible, and maybe the wording was confusing. Once again I admire this blog and I encourage you to keep up the great work and continue to tell the world the scripture. Biblical prophecy is coming to pass before our eyes… lets all be ready!

  5. admin says:

    Jonny,

    Thanks for taking the time to express, with constructive criticism, your disagreement with a few of the statements I have made. I admire your willingness to discuss your conviction openly.

    Here is my rebuttal:
    I stated Ahmadinejad was “responsible for of thousands (if not millions) in the name of ‘Allah’, the god of Islam.” Although we most likely have not arrived at the estimation of ‘millions’ (hence the parenthesis), the death of thousands is certainly justifiable. It is an explicit nature of A-jad’s regime to silence opposition through the use of public stonings, hangings of political dissidents, and military crackdowns on peaceful protests and gatherings. His anti-semitic ideology and crude totalitarian views elicit violence and civil unrest not just among his countrymen, but among surrounding Islamic states as well. He has undeniably permitted the smuggling of weapons into Iraq, pro-longing the war and no doubt increasing the death toll on American military and newly constructed Iraqi government. Should he obtain nuclear weapons, we will soon arrive at a million+ death tally. To put it bluntly … an Iran with nuclear weapons is like one big-ass suicide bomber. He has repeatedly made it clear that, even at the expense of the lives of ALL Iranians, he is prepared to do the ‘will of Allah’. His view, I contend, is not a twisted or distorted understanding of Islam, but a very pure embrace of its distinct religious fundamentals.

    In response to the excerpts you posted, I can only tell you this. Christianity (a word that has become heavily misused) is the belief in Christ and the words which he has spoken. He alone is the measure of all its validity. From your comments I cannot conclude that you were questioning this, but I can see that you perceive Christianity as having an influence over the ages on war criminals like Hitler. Again, when criticizing Islam, I look to its scriptures and founder, Muhammad. Should Hitler truly have been influenced by the likes of Martin Luther and Karl Lueger, I don’t think that provides valid conclusions about anything regarding the true nature of Christianity, nor does it provide any sort of analogy for what is going on in Ahmadinejad’s regime. We are arguing about true nature, correct? Nothing else is relevant. Even so, it is fallacious to say that because evildoers have once become under the influence of a particular ideology, that ideology is therefore a causative of their actions.

    If you look at my first comment, in the first paragraph I stated that the belief that Al Quida, Hamas and Hezbollah were ‘fringe movements’ was false. So to say that I ‘brought them up’ as fringe movements is sort of an incorrect premise. You ask “Why do they call it RADICAL Islam my friend?” This is exactly my point. The western world does not seem to understand that groups such as Al Quida, Hamas and Hezbollah are only radical in the sense that they contrast greatly with our general perception, and not that they contrast greatly with the true nature of Islam. Most westerners are convicted that the beheading of a woman who has been raped (known as mercy killing), is morally wrong. Yet such things are encouraged in the doctrine of Islam. We can accurately call them ‘radicals’ or ‘extremists’ because their perception of morality vastly differs from that of our own.

    In regard to your reference to ‘terrorist groups and militias around the world and right here in America which are steeped in Christian belief and symbolism’, I must again refer you to the basic Christian tenet that Christ is the measure of all things. Christianity holds that men are corrupt, the only exception is Christ who was God.

    And finally, in response to your closing statement, that Christians should not ‘peddle fear’ to the masses, I have only this to say. In light of the wickedness of man, and the circumstance it has now created in the present day — many of us ought to be afraid. As the scriptures tell us, fear is the beginning of understanding.

  6. CoreO says:

    How are you? Just a correction for you, it is Revelations 13:1-2.. not Romans 13:1-2

  7. admin says:

    @CoreO
    Thanks for noticing that.

Leave a Reply